Don’t be like Sally, Don’t be a SWERF

I am not a trust fund kid.

I didn’t have an allowance for most of my childhood. At some point I was regularly given a small amount of lunch money. It was to be used when I was hungry for food. This “allowance” was not tied to whether or not I did my chores. My social freedom was tied to whether or not I did my chores.

As I got older I started to need more money to keep up with my friends. My parents didn’t have extra income, so like most kids in low income families I was told it was time to get a job.

I am still a very low income earner, making much less than the poverty line year after year. In some ways these days, I choose to because I would rather spend my time, energy, mental, and bodily resources on being an artist instead of giving up those things up in order to have more money. Artists who aren’t commercial in their approach to art don’t usually benefit much financially. I have too much to say about sex, gender, identity, inequality, and other non-commercial realities to fit in there. Struggle is a part of my journey.

You could say I was “forced into the fast food industry” as a teenager, and then retail, and then hospitality due to poverty. I didn’t have parents with connections to well paying summer jobs, I had no uncle who I could work in “the office” for and make connections through, I had no friends whose family owned a theater I could direct or run a youth program at… If I wanted to socialize with my friends I needed to make money however I could, and after hitting the pavement with my short resume, Dairy Queen was the first realistic option I had. They were willing to work with my summer theater schedule as long as I covered my shifts if there were conflicts (though later they fired me for getting too many of my shifts covered). That was my first job. Later in life I would need money for rent and utilities and whatever I needed money for — this is our capitalist reality.

I have a specialized degree in acting, as well as continued education in my field. My career is in the arts, and I’ve also been a sexuality educator for nearly 20 years, which started as a retail job in a sex store during college. I owe lots and lots of money to college lenders, and I’m not in a financial position to pay them back. I work hard, I work with passion, and I work a lot. I’m good at what I do and I’ve fought my entire adult life to carve out enough gig-based self-employment to keep me afloat. Naturally (I am an actor, after all) some forms of sex work have made their way into my gig economy. The ways I’ve taken on sex work in my life have been mostly affirming, definitely educational, and they’ve aided me in having the time and space I need to continue doing the work I’m passionate about while supporting myself. Most recently sex work in tandem with producing my art has helped me move from living on the road in a van, to living in an apartment with more space and definitely more expenses.

Being forced into sex work because of poverty is not consent. It’s economic coercion! If women really choose prostitution, why is it mostly marginalized and disadvantaged women who do? ~Unknown SWERF

I came across this quote recently. SWERFs (Sex Work Exclusionary Radical Feminists) are a subset of people within “feminism” who believe sex workers are anti-feminist. Personally I think SWERFs and TERFs (Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminists) are anti-feminist. The notion that a woman (or anyone) should not have a right to autonomously choose with whom, how, and under what conditions to have sex or perform sexuality is ludacris if you call yourself a feminist.

Sex work is one of the only types of work held to this standard. Where in our national conversation about almost every minimum wage job do we ask these same questions? Who’s going around asking if the workers in factories, fast food establishments, farmers, dive restaurant wait staff, or any other backbreaking, demoralizing, or dirty job clientele needs to be freed from their undesirable situation? Instead the pacifying ideology, “A job is a job, you do what you need to do to pay the bills” is what echos when discussing the shitty parts of being the working poor — a growing class in today’s economy. It seems as though only when speaking of sex work does the conversational tone radically shift and the party line become, “Why would you resort to such a thing?!”

Let me be clear: after making money in the sex industry I am much less exhausted physically and morally than I ever was waiting tables.

Sexual autonomy is freedom. For the pyramid scheme which is capitalism to work it can’t have women, transpeople, people of color, and other marginalized plebeians “making their’s”, and thereby wriggling out from under the thumb of poverty and economic slavery. You’d never be able to control the masses if it caught on that sex work is work and some people (often marginalized and disadvantaged people) actually choose it as their industry. Add to this political circus-of-oppression a kickline of “feminists” singing a song of victimization and then letting loose the battle cry of “no cis woman ever wanted to grow up to be a sex worker!”, and there seem to be even less women standing up for women’s sexual autonomy and freedom from capitalist chains. Sex workers (of all sexes and genders) are often seen fighting for women’s sexual autonomy more openly and radically than their middle or upper class elite “intellectual” feminist counterparts. I assume this is because most sex workers know what it’s like to fight the patriarchy face to face within their own industry day in and day out without the respect of their non sex worker sisters at day’s end. I’m sure sex workers may also care less about what society has to say or whether they’ll lose their job for speaking out, though there are many other dangers in revealing your SW identity, especially today in the US. It’s hard work to peel back the layers of shame and insecurity we’ve all been vested with and walk boldly into the career choice of a sex worker, illegally or legally employed.

To answer the quote above more directly: sure, it’s not wholly untrue that frequently people choose to engage in sex work of one kind or another because of economic coercion. However if you fix the system that coerces people into entering sex work, you must then make space for and respect the people who continue to do sex work because they choose to. What then? Well, let’s actually start giving consensual adult sex workers what they want.

What sex workers want is decriminalization. Sex workers and almost all clients of sex workers want sex work to be safe, chosen, consensual, not trafficked, nor coerced. Sex workers want to be able to go to the authorities when there’s a reason to without worrying about arrest, rape, interrogation, disbelief, or any other violent manifestation of whorephobia. The “Craigslist Killer” was caught in part because sex workers were able to openly go to the police with their information during the period of time Rhode Island had decriminalized indoor sex work. Rates of STIs and rape in the general population went significantly down during this time too.

Decriminalization is a healthier legal choice within a world which has never, historically, been without sex workers. Sacred sex workers have been part of the church and played important roles in politics in past civilizations. Sex workers are often sexuality educators, and help clients who haven’t been sexually educated become so, including becoming better socialized at navigating the subject of sex within society and their own personal communities.

Sex workers want sex trafficking to end and for victims of these crimes to get the care, attention, and resources they need. Sex workers want sex traffickers and anyone else who makes adult consensual sex work unsafe dealt with by the law.

Imagine if all the people in jail for non-violent drug charges were to be let go, and instead we focused on arresting and prosecuting violent offenders, rapists, domestic abusers, and those participating in sex trafficking who are not the victims of trade. I have a feeling the prison system’s incarcerated population would on average become more white and somewhat less impoverished.

Who might be choosing sex work as their vocation in that world? Well, just like in this one, the people who are sex workers would.

Play On My Friends,
~ Creature

Please support this writing and art through my Patreon campaign.
~Thank you.

Freedom

The bill, H.R. 1865, otherwise known as the “Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act”, or “FOSTA”,  passed the House last week even though it’s been deemed unconstitutional by the Department of Justice. This bill doesn’t do what it portends to, which is make it legal for prosecutors to go after internet companies who allow sex trafficking to be advertised on their websites. It’s already legal to prosecute sex trafficking and those who aid it. The current interest in FOSTA by our government officials is as a tool to indict Backpage on trafficking charges for allowing traffickers to advertise on their online service. This bill does a number of other things though, including threaten free speech on the internet, make it harder for smaller companies to grow and thrive, deny consensually working sex workers the safety of an open platform to find, vet, and negotiate with clients, and sends actual sex traffickers deeper into the underground where it will be harder for law enforcement to find them, much less prosecute.

By making internet companies liable for all content posted using their services (in a way which still makes it easy for large companies to deny knowing anything, and leaves smaller companies with limited resources high and dry), it forces internet companies to police consumers. This limits everyone’s freedom of speech and freedom of expression on the internet in the long run. Sex workers, sex trafficking survivors, free speech advocates, internet companies, even the Department of Justice, and a host of other groups have spoken out against this bill. Politicians are, as usual, happy to pass a badly written and poorly researched bill which looks good to uneducated constituents, all the while putting at risk the general public and harming sex workers who are disproportionately women, transpeople, frequently POC, and Queer. Surprised much?

A word on conflation: Do you know the difference between sex work and sex trafficking? An important thing to understand in our modern debate over freedom of one’s own body, is that there is a difference between sex trafficking and consensual commercial sex work. Sex trafficking is coerced sex work. Not all sex workers are coerced into their jobs. Many sex workers are happy with their chosen vocation.

Loosely defined a sex worker is a person employed by the sex industry. The sex industry is vast and includes strippers, professional dominants/submissives/switches, prostitutes, adult entertainment actors/producers/crew members/management, phone sex operators, web cam performers, sex surrogates, sexologists, and a host of other occupations. As you can see not all sex workers trade sexual contact for money. People who choose sex work come from and have a variety of backgrounds, fields of interest, levels of education, ethnicities, genders and sexes, relationship statuses, body types, and have varied personal and professional boundaries regarding what activities they will and will not engage in for pay. Every sex worker I know decides who they will take on as a client or employer, and what activities they are comfortable engaging in, with whom, under what circumstances, and when. Like any other industry there are even sex worker unions in some areas of the country which help SWs advocate for their needs on the job and help ensure their safety to a higher degree. Some people engage in sex work infrequently, informally, or for a short period of time in order to make ends meet (also known as “survival sex work”), and some sex workers view their job as a full time, long term occupation.

Sex trafficking (forced sex work, or sex slavery), is the term used to describe anyone who is forced to engage in sex work against their will, or who is coerced into it against their choice.

When law enforcement or the media talk about sex trafficking, they often conflate the issue with consensual sex work. They often go after, traumatize, and harm people who are making a living consensually and as safely as they are able to negotiating with clients in order to pay the bills.

Why does it matter that we make a distinction between sex workers and sex traffickers? The most immediate reason I can think of is safety. The safety of sex workers when consensually vetting, negotiating with, or working with a client is threatened when there is no discernment between what they are doing and what a victim of sex trafficking is being forced into doing. As sex workers are forced further and further underground under the guise of (due to a conflation with) “stop sex trafficking” measures, SWs lose access to a level of safety and protection which open air conversations provide. When everyone’s freedom of speech is restricted concerning sex work, and the places sex workers can be found are more and more remote or coded, a SW’s ability to reasonably vet clients, stand up to bosses who they feel are coercing them, report abuse/assault/rape, demand condom use, have access to meaningful healthcare, or any number of other wrongdoings becomes increasingly difficult to bring to light without the fear of retribution, being ignored, blamed, abused, or worse.

In study after study it has been shown that when sex work is decriminalized, STI rates drop as do rates of rape and domestic abuse in the general population. Decriminalization of consensual commercial sex work is not the same as decriminalization of sex trafficking. Everyone is better served by making these distinctions and going after the real bad guys. Bad guys who are frequently not women, trans people, queers, and POC (just sayin’). We need to demand more from our elected officials.

Play On My Friends,
~ Creature

Please support my work on Patreon. For one time donations click here: Support the Artist 
~Thank you.

Age Verification: www.ABCsOfKink.com addresses adult sensual and sexual information, including imagery associated with a wide variety of BDSM topics and themes. This website is available to readers who are 18+ (and/or of legal adult age within their districts). If you are 18+, please select the "Entry" button below. If you are not yet of adult age as defined by your country and state or province, please click the "Exit" link below. If you're under the age of consent, we recommend heading over to www.scarleteen.com — an awesome website, which is more appropriate to minors looking for information on these subjects. Thank you!