W is for WAND (the Electric kind)

Violet Wands are one of my favorite tools of the trade: they offer a range of sensations and accessories, you can turn them up and down to accommodate almost anyone’s acceptable sensitivity zone, if you’re a gear head you’re in heaven with all the pretty parts and pieces, the smell of ozone-mixed-with-overheated-flesh-and-burning-hair is fearsome and fantastic, and they bring out the “scared but interested” kid face in most people — all things I must say I absolutely revel in!

My first encounter with a wand was pretty boring. I got zapped, it didn’t really hurt, and I didn’t really see the appeal. My second encounter was during a very heavy interrogation scene. The wand was what broke me, in fact. Fun! After that I was hooked, and once even enjoyed a wand scene which lasted a couple hours and spanned a very diverse range of attachments. I felt like a cat being pet with edgy electric energy all over — it was incredibly sexy.

As a Dom/Top in the wide world of wands, the first time I wielded one was at Burning Man. I was part of a kinkster camp which was basically run by professional Dominants, BDSM teachers, and longtime scenesters. I taught a class while I was there called “Styles of Submission”, about the many different reasons people submit and what they’re each looking for from their Dominant in scene. I took a work shift as a “Dom on Duty” in their dungeon space. This meant I was available to answer questions to anyone passing by wondering what our camp was about, and I could offer kink experiences to people depending on what they were interested in trying out. We had some dungeon furniture set up, bondage equipment, sensation toys, impact toys, and one of the Professionals who was helping run the space had laid out her Violet Wand kit for our use. Sufficed to say, when some interested bloke wandered in and asked what it was like to be prodded with electricity, I found myself in scene arcing purple electric sparks onto his balls and watching amazedly as he dripped not a small amount of pre-come onto the sand below the spanking bench he was bent over… An inkling that I might someday become a proper Dom was definitely born. Since that day I’ve seduced more than one person into overcoming their fear of Violet Wands and electricity play. If there’s one thing I shine at, I’m pretty sure it’s making something overwhelming seem accessible while honoring safe play, listening intently to my sub, and creating experiences that are, in fact, enjoyable for all involved.

For my birthday this year I asked my community to fundraise for one of these very expensive toys, and my community came through for me! I ordered a kit boasting a bunch of fun attachments, and a heavy-duty wand model that will allow me to play for longer without having to cool down (something I know I’ll need). The wand boasts a higher range of intensity than others, a foot pedal for quick on/off/accessory switching ease, a grounding attachment which turns the entire body into an electrified playground, cat claws, and other fun and silly bits and pieces. It also features a tool for temporary and permanent branding, and a short length of electricity play compatible rope! I am more than excited to break this gorgeous instrument of pain and pleasure in.

Things to be aware of: Though Violet Wands are pretty safe, there are things you want to be aware of when using one. They are not compatible with people who have heart conditions, pacemakers, insulin pumps, or other electrically operating implants. You should know ahead of time if there are any metal knee or hip replacements in your victim. You don’t want to use your wand within a foot of metal implants. You need to make sure the wand is never wet, that the electricity supply you’re using is properly wired and safe, and that your equipment is in good working order with nothing burned out.

Violet wands function by converting your high voltage home electricity into a low watt, low amp, yet high frequency output similar to static electricity, but with an ongoing source so you can enjoy a steady shock instead of one quick zap and back to the shuffling around. The shock doesn’t penetrate very far into the skin and is fairly safe. Like I mentioned before, there are attachments which can cause branding to occur, and in general you want to keep the wand moving over someone’s body rather than holding it still in one area. The toy’s contact surface area must be pretty small and made of a very conductive material, like metal, for something as intense as branding to happen, but even with glass electrodes if you leave your zap on one area long enough, expect a light sunburn or petechiae to develop.

Danger mainly enters into the equation when something (wand or wiring or wet) isn’t working properly. It doesn’t happen often, and there are precautions you can put in place. Ground-Fault Circuit Interrupters (GFCIs) are an easy fix if you’re worried about a wiring malfunction. Keeping your toy clean, inspected, stored properly, serviced by a professional, and away from water will pretty much handle the rest. Other than that, just make sure you don’t electrocute things you don’t mean to! Remember that metal jewelry often conducts electricity at a high intensity, so consider removing it unless you plan on playing with it intentionally.

Warning: you will electrocute yourself. It happens. Don’t use a wand if you aren’t willing to get zapped yourself now and then by mistake. Most importantly though, start low and build up intensity. Not everyone has a very good tolerance for electrical sensations, and some people conduct electricity very easily while others just simply do not. The easiest way to make someone hate electrical play is by zapping them too intensely right away — and then all that money you spent on the thing has gone down the drain while you watch them throw “violet wand” on the red list. I’ve had the incredible experience of bringing people back into the electrical fold who had suffered such indecencies, and I have to say that while I’m always happy to convert people by working slowly and being trustworthy, it would be better if I never had a reason to…

If you ever get a chance to play with electricity in this way, I highly recommend trying it out. Have fun my Dr. Frankensteins! Oh, and if you’d like to add to my kit as a late birthday present, check out my Violet Wand Wishlist and send me a note.

Play On My Friends,
~ Creature

Please support my work on Patreon, or for one time: Support the Artist or email me.
~Thank you.

A is for ARCHETYPE

Cultural expectations are killing us. Men are expected to be split between body and intellect — archetypes illustrated as the “bruiser/blue collar worker” vs. the “CEO/nerd/inventor”. Similarly women must be split between their sexuality and nurturing instincts with archetypes most commonly iterate as the “Mother” vs. the “Whore”.

Transness, gender fluidity, non-binary identity, and/or having a focus on personal completeness outside of social construct is a beautiful and freeing place to reside and play within the self. The opportunity to recognize complexity not only within one’s own sex, gender identity, and orientation, but within all of the roles and archetypes set forth within society is critical work. Each of us is a dynamic whole attracted to and successful in embodying (to varying degrees) any archetype presented. Naturally we align with some types more than others — though if being a character actor has taught me anything, it is that empathy for all “types” is not only possible but deeply important and personally effectacious.

The construction worker/plumber/farmer (male body-alligned archetype) day in and day out also works with numbers and real world problem solving to get the job done. The CEO/computer programmer/scientist (deemed essentially intellectual) in order to be effective is inspired by their ability to take in the responses and reactions to their work by the self and the physical world around.

Pregnancy, the so-called harbinger of a nurturer-to-be, is a natural result of expressed sexuality.  Not all sexuality will result in pregnancy. Not all pregnancies are a result of sex or consensual sexuality. Not all nurturers have been through a pregnancy. Not all pregnancies result in nurturing. The nurturer must attend to the needs of their own body first in order not to burn out or harm those in their charge. The sexually accommodating/free/engaged person must care for their health through medical checks, research, development of habits with which to stay safe and healthy, trips to the store for toys, various supplies, and cleaning materials — is this not a dedicated form of nurturance? Sharing a thoughtful and enjoyable sexuality can be deeply nurturing.

Our realities are more complex than the variably defined filters which “identity” causes us to view our civilization, one another, and ourselves through.

Behavior: what we do is as important as how we identify. If we identified along the lines of every experience we’ve had, over time we might allow ourselves to continue having more varied experiences. There is a crisis in communication concerning sexuality, a gap of honesty within ourselves and to one another which allows us to cling tightly to an “idea of oneself” — one’s stated identity — which sends concentric shock waves of distortion to all those nearby. For example, who’s ever been in a relationship where they’ve been led to believe one thing about their partner which, in actual practice, was not completely lived as advertised? We deceive through omission much about our experiences, our behaviors, and our feelings, perhaps in an effort to fit in with what we believe others wish to believe about us, and perhaps to reinforce that which we wish to believe about ourselves.

What if we identified as we have behaved: I’m a “enjoys-making-out-with-anyone-I-feel-kindly-toward-when-I’m-drunk-but-have-only-dated-AMAB-people-romantically-yet-have-enjoyed-being-fisted-by-a-female-during-a-threesome-once-and-only-want-penetration-about-once-a-week-on-average-unless-it’s-with-someone-new-sexual”? It would be more difficult for that person to communicate quickly about what they like and don’t like. I think even more insidiously though, it would be even harder for them to have to explain (and personally own) dissonance with others in a moment of confrontation.

When a woman says they’re “heterosexual”, yet behaviorally has had the experience of making out with another woman “for their male partner’s enjoyment” and found that they liked it too, that woman is not generally expected to make out with other women whenever the opportunity arises. A simple “I’m straight” usually suffices in shutting the scenario down wherever it’s coming from (proposition from another woman, boyfriend wanting it to happen again, or whomever suggesting something like that occur). No one in the situation has to feel bad — because you can’t fight their “identity”. In reality she just might not feel like it. Sadly that’s not a protected reason for turning someone down in most communities, and that articulation may not be respected.

People use a similar line of meaning making when they fail to disclose sexual activity to a partner they’re supposed to be transparent with when the sexual experience happened outside the parameters of “counting”. Take that same woman, she might have a sexual experience with another woman and not tell her boyfriend about it because “it didn’t count” since she’s “heterosexual”. He may still want knowledge of that activity disclosed.

Yet another way this manifests is in longterm repression of personal interests and desires. That same woman may repress her desire to have sexual or sensual experiences with women because she doesn’t want her “heterosexuality” (and let’s be honest: usually all of the privileges it holds) to be put into question by herself or by others.

In all of the above instances it’s illustrated that we’re more attached to the “idea of an identity” than we are to being honest with others or even ourselves about our feelings, reactions, desires, actions, and possibilities. It’s hard to say to someone “I’m not interested” without having an excuse for why it’s “not about them” and “not in your control”. It’s difficult to be explicit and thoughtful about one’s feelings when faced with opportunity, desire, fear, confusion, complexity, inexperience, and a million other felt situations. It’s hard to react to a moment by slowing down and considering all of the moving parts before explaining what you are open and not open to experiencing in that very moment. Sometimes this is doubly reinforced because we are afraid of another person’s reaction to rejection. I think it’s also connected to the common desire “to be liked”. Rejection may cause others not to like us as much, and most everyone wants to identify as “someone who is liked”.

I identify as “sexual”, as in: I’m either attracted to you or not, just like everyone else. A note on what this does not mean:

  • This doesn’t mean that if I am attracted to you I necessarily want to get sexy or romantic about it.
  • This doesn’t mean that if I’m not sexually attracted to you that I never will be. I’ve found on more than one occasion that after years of getting to know someone more intimately I’ve come to find them increasingly sexually palatable and if the right moment came along so might some degree of romantic or sensual/sexual connection.
  • This doesn’t mean that if I am attracted to you and want to get down about it right now that I’ll feel that way in a half hour, a week, or a year from now. I’ve definitely fallen out of sexual attraction with people, and I don’t think I’m the only one to have that experience.

These are all reasons why our culture’s deepening understanding surrounding consent is so important in conversations about sensuality and identity. We are starting more and more fully to recognize the complexity of everyone’s wiring and to ask for consent each time we want to plug in. This is also why it’s critical to be able to talk about sexuality and identity and have the courage to articulate, consider, grow, change, and rearticulate as our needs, feelings, and interests evolve.

The Maiden, the Mother, and the Crone: which is to say, it’s already archetypically expected that through experience and time we change, we grow, and we become. I remember reading an article once that quoted an older person who had been in a very long relationship with their spouse, and they said something to the effect of: to remain in a longterm relationship for decade upon decade one must fall in love with their partner over and over again as they become new people. No one remains unchanged in their lives. Our cells are dying and newly growing every day. We are meant to move through archetypes as we move through new experiences, and to see the world with new eyes and through new reasoning over time. In this technology filled society which overly acknowledges 13-27 year olds and pushes the value of individuality over community, in this time of single generation social groups and media reinforced divisiveness between age brackets, we all lose. We lose sight of one another. We lose sight of where we’re going and where we’ve been. We lose sight of the Earth we live on and the needs of all the organisms cohabiting on our planet which we are not directly speaking to or directing our energies at. Because of these losses we lose the richness of our incredibly complex and diversely intelligent selves. Without these losses, who might each of us be?

Play On My Friends,
~ Creature

Please support my work on Patreon, or for one time: Support the Artist or email me.
~Thank you.

S is for SEXUAL HEALTH (and self love)

Making crystallized ginger. Also, incidentally, a “fig” — though that’s for another post.

I am making crystallized ginger in my kitchen, I started some fermented honey garlic the other day, and there’s newly portioned homemade lentil & barley vegetable soup in the freezer. I just bought a new vibrator to replace the one I use most which was failing. I also recently had a full STI panel done (including blood work for lyme disease, ’cause summer in Albany = bites by ticks). Each of these actions are forms of self love, partner care, and respect for my communities. Each of these things contributes to my emotional, psychological, and physical health this winter, and so the health of those I’m around as well.

Instead of simply reminding my readers to go out and get tested today, I’m going to write about how to have some of the hard conversations (even with ourselves) which need to be had for sexual and sensual health to be maintained actively between testings. Truthfully, even though I’ve been talking about sexual health for decades personally and professionally, even I need to remind myself to be more thoughtful about my health and the risks I’m taking when I play sometimes. It’s easy to get lulled into a false sense of comfort when you’re healthy for awhile or have ongoing monogamous partnerships. It’s in these places of comfort that the opportunity for mistakes or the unexpected to happen finds its way.

It’s complex to know your sexually transmitted infection status: It is not how often you get tested which is the most important detail to consider, but the window of time it takes a bacteria or virus to incubate to show up as positive. For example, according to STDCheck.com, Chlamydia has an incubation period of 1-5 days before it will show up on a test as positive (though another online source cites 1-3 weeks), whereas HIV has an incubation period of 9 days-3 months depending on the type of test given. This doesn’t take into account bad testing conditions and people who are more likely to test false negative. I once tested positive for Chlamydia and none of the other people I was sleeping with at the time, or for three months prior (since the test before that one) tested positive. It’s more common for people with penises to test false negative than people with vulvas in certain tests, and most doctors don’t inform their patients that drinking a lot of water before being tested might skew results, or to abstain from peeing for one hour before certain tests.

I try to get tested for STIs every three months unless I’m in a monogamous relationship — though perceived monogamy and exposure to STIs are certainly not mutually exclusive, and cheating and lying percentages are high in our world. Three months because that seems to be the magic number than most STIs have for a max incubation period, and three months because that seems to be about how long I’m interested in most people I’m frequently having sex with. Having an STI check after a breakup feels great! If I’m in a monogamous relationship I make sure my partner and I have been tested before we become sexually active with one another, or that we’re both tested near the beginning of our sexual relationship and we discuss our results. After that I get tested every 6 months or at my yearly doctor’s visit. If I am having sex with more than one person or a partner of mine is, we talk about the risks involved and what our agreements around safer sex and disclosure with one another are, and what we promise to do if/when someone fucks up.

I don’t have sex with people without talking about STI’s first. This means if we’re getting hot ‘n heavy and we haven’t spoken about our sexual histories with one another in detail before, we’re going to stop and take a talk break before we get too risky and carried away. Have I ever messed up and not done so? Yes, though we did have the talk afterward and that situation makes me feel really shitty. Each time was due to being intoxicated. Also not good, but good to see the pattern and make note. Also, I must say that in almost every single sexual experience I’ve had I’ve been the one to broach the subject. This leads me to believe that if I don’t take the responsibility to talk about sexual health, that many many people would just never talk about STIs at all. This is VERY concerning to me.

Talking to others about sexual contact and evaluating risks: It’s hard to do until it isn’t anymore. Practice makes perfect, and figuring out how you best like to start the conversation will dramatically help you feel prepared. There are a lot of questions to ask, and it’s important that you’re getting the information you need from your potential sex partner to feel safe about moving forward into risky territory. If a potential partner gets angry about being asked to talk about sex and STI status, if they don’t answer your questions fully, or try to breeze through the conversation and downplay its importance, consider that a risky behavior in itself. How upfront is this person and how upfront have they been with other partners — if they’ve even had this conversation at all — and what does that mean about their knowledge of their own body or what risks they’ve engaged in historically? Though it may be emotionally hard to talk about your sexual past and current risk factors, do you really want to have sex with someone who won’t care for your body at the very minimum by talking before fucking? Here are some questions and phrases to open up a conversation:

  • I’m really into this, can we pause and have “the talk” before going any further?
  • What talk? Oh, STI history, other relationships or sex partners, and safer sex practices. Who wants to go first?
  • Have you ever had an STI?
    • What have you tested positive for?
    • When was your last outbreak?
    • Were you treated for it?
    • Is your outbreak still active?
    • Have you been tested since treatment (and if so what was the result)?
      • Keep in mind that if the infection was bacterial (Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, Syphilis, etc.) there is still a window of time after treatment where a retest will not prove effective, so make sure you retest within the recommended timetable for each treatment.
      • As for viral infections (HSV 1 and 2 [Herpes], HPV [Warts], HIV, Hepatitis [A, B, C]), the virus will remain suppressed in your system after exposure and between outbreaks, so retesting isn’t as useful as you will test positive from that point forward even when no outbreak is occuring.
      • Decide how you feel about exposure to a virus if your partner has tested positive for one or has had an outbreak of a viral infection in the past. Ask more questions if you have them.
  • When was your last STI test, and what were you tested for?
    • What were your test results?
    • Have you had sex with anyone since your last test or sex with anyone directly before your last test who might not have been covered by the last test?
    • Are you having sex with other people currently — are they regular or casual partners?
      • What are your safety agreements with these people?
      • What are their statuses or known risks associated with them?
      • Are you having protected sex with these people every time you have sex or just sometimes?
  • What safer sex methods do you use (if any)?
    • Do you use barrier methods for PIV (penis in vagina)?
    • Anal?
    • Oral?
    • Toys?
    • Every time?
    • Any time recently you haven’t?
    • Do you share toys?
    • How do you clean toys between uses?
    • Do you have this talk with everyone you have sexual contact with?
    • Do you engage in risky sexual behavior when you feel you are having an outbreak of any sort (safer or not)?
    • Have you ever had a cold sore? If so, recently? Can you tell when one is coming on?
  • Anything else you think of, or questions that arise as you’re having this talk are great! Ask away!

What makes it hard to talk about STI status is the same thing that makes it hard to talk about sex: cultural stigmas, lack of practice, internalized feelings of shame, and fear of repercussions. If you’re positive for various viruses or have had a bacterial infection recently, don’t let that stop you from asking questions of your partners and sharing your own experiences upfront. Take responsibility for your health and the health of your partner. In my opinion the number one reason it’s important to have these conversations is that being clear about health risks associated with sexual behavior contributes to consensual sex. If you’re in the middle of having “the talk” and realize you don’t want to expose yourself to a risk that person poses, you have the right to say no and change your behavior with them. There are a lot of incredibly sexy things people can do with each other without putting themselves at risk of various infections. This same opportunity to consent or decline to risks should be given to anyone you engage in sex with. If you knowingly risk giving someone an STI without disclosing your history or status, you are taking away someone’s right to consent to those risks on their own terms. You do not have the right to make decisions for anyone else’s body, just as no one has the right to make decisions for yours. Only through openly and honestly talking do we respectfully come to a place of “what next?”.

Some helpful ideas about non-judgmentally thinking and communicating about STIs and sexual health:

  • Using the words “Positive” and “Negative” rather than “clean” in regards to test results. Just because someone has tested positive for an STI does not mean they are dirty or unhygienic, just as testing negative for certain infections certainly does not mean they are “clean” or even negative of all health concerns. It’s false terminology which contributes to stigmatization. Anyone who is sexually active can test positive for an STI, and in fact 50% of adults test positive for at least one STI in their lives. We don’t consider ourselves “clean” because we haven’t caught the flu yet this season. It is more medically accurate to use the term “negative” in reference to a test, and it’s more likely to put someone at ease if they aren’t being asked if they are “clean”. People who are less worried about judgement are less likely to lie or shut down in a conversation which is best executed openly and honestly.
  • Avoiding words like “slut”, “promiscuous”, “sleep around” when asking about someone’s sexual history. Asking “how many partners have you had since your last test?” will give you a more accurate answer, and will not make you look like a judgemental jerk while asking. Remember too that everyone has a different idea about what constitutes promiscuity — usually “more sexually active than I am” is what ends up fitting the bill, which is no way to measure another person’s experiences meaningfully, lovingly, or helpfully.
  • Let your partner know that you’re happy to answer any questions they have, and that waiting or refraining from certain activities is totally ok with you. People who are less experienced may feel afraid to ask questions, or may think that because they perceive you to be more experienced that they should just go with the flow and trust blindly. This is especially true if there’s a power dynamic differential in play. People may feel pressure to “do X now or never” regardless of needing some time to process the conversation you’ve just had about risks and histories. Letting people know that more conversation is always welcome, that there’s no pressure to engage in anything anyone’s uncomfortable with, and that “no” is always an appreciated boundary when put on the table, is not only responsible and appropriate it’s the behavior of a more tuned in partner. Who doesn’t want that?
  • Remember that testing positive for an STI is not the end of the world. You’re in good company — millions of normal, everyday, sexy people are diagnosed with various sexually transmitted infections every year. Many STIs are 100% treatable, and others are easily supressible. Even HIV is not the death sentence it was 20 years ago, and lots of people who are currently HIV negative treat themselves against exposure with PrEP.
  • Learning you are positive for an STI or have been exposed to one is not a finger pointing “whose fault is it” moment. STIs exist, and by having sexual contact with other people you are putting yourself at risk. When you catch the flu you don’t hunt down the people who might have given it to you so you can yell at them (at least I hope you don’t), you let the people around you know that you’re sick so that you don’t pass the flu along unnecessarily. When you test positive for an STI it’s important to let all of your relevant past partners know they have been exposed or might have exposed you, and that they need to talk with their other partners and seek treatment and testing. By caring for ourselves, and our partners we care for the larger community as a whole. Do your part, and don’t assume anyone you had sexual contact with knowingly meant you harm. If you are adult enough to have sex, you should be adult enough to talk about it even when the conversation isn’t sexy or ideal. It’s time to clean up the mess, not point fingers in judgement of everyone around so you avoid taking responsibility yourself.

There is always so much more I can write, but I think this is a good stopping point for now. I hope you have some great conversations with partners about sex, and if the unexpected ever does come up that you feel empowered to talk about it with past and present companions. Educate yourself on how STIs are contracted, treated, their incubation windows, and test times. Understand in your bones that people have their own lives, desires, and demons and aren’t always 100% honest about their behaviors. Take responsibility for your decisions and your body. I hope my words have helped you feel more comfortable speaking up on behalf of your health and so the health of everyone.

Play On My Friends,
~ Creature

Please support my work on Patreon. For one time donations click here: Support the Artist 
~Thank you.

 

Age Verification: www.ABCsOfKink.com addresses adult sensual and sexual information, including imagery associated with a wide variety of BDSM topics and themes. This website is available to readers who are 18+ (and/or of legal adult age within their districts). If you are 18+, please select the "Entry" button below. If you are not yet of adult age as defined by your country and state or province, please click the "Exit" link below. If you're under the age of consent, we recommend heading over to www.scarleteen.com — an awesome website, which is more appropriate to minors looking for information on these subjects. Thank you!